Question 2. How did the Rhapsodes perform" Does it make any difference if they sand or spoke their texts? Why do you think this issue is raised by these Hargis and Bahn in their articles?
The rhapsodes performed by means of oral poetry. This meant a variety of things, either singing, telling jokes or just telling the story. The Rhapsodes also used variations of improvising to create their stories to illustrate the story.
While they are known as oral poets, they are best known for singing. This is not to say that they only sang, (See statement above) but the variation of technique allowed for a number of good things to happen. Singing, or speaking in a melodic tone, while nice to hear, is easy to remember and engaging to the audience. Also, singing, as opposed to just "saying the text" allows for a stronger comprehension of an entertainment value. If the text were just spoken, it reads alot like a lecture.
Question 3. What was the function of the Rhapsode in Greek Society? Whose interests were served by this performance format?
The purpose of the Rhapsode is to serve and inform the masses. In BC, (Before Cable) there was only one way to gain information and to be entertained. The Rhapsodes served the purpose of both, being both news caster and entertainer in the same time.
While many benefited from the work of the Rhapsodes, they are best suited for the general public. The public, who may not be as educated as the higher class, received their informaiton his way. While it can be noted that they used the rhapsodes to deliver information to the public, it appears that the upper classes could stand to benefit from this format in terms of controlling what the general public knows.
